Ad image

Herbal Researcher David Ssenfuka Sues Andrew Mwenda, The Independent for Shs1.08 Trillion Over ‘Conman’ Article

Ssenfuka addressed journalists and displayed framed photographs, which he said were linked to patients and individuals associated with his work, as part of his effort to defend the credibility of his research.

Jamal Junior
By
Jamal Junior - Editor
Herbal Researcher David Ssenfuka Sues Andrew Mwenda
Highlights
  • David Ssenfuka has filed a defamation lawsuit against veteran journalist
  • Ssenfuka contends that the publication seriously damaged his reputation
  • The High Court will determine whether the publication was defamatory and whether Ssenfuka is entitled to a compensation
Makerere University-affiliated herbal researcher David Ssenfuka has filed a defamation lawsuit against veteran journalist and proprietor of The Independent magazine, Andrew Mwenda, seeking Shs1.08 trillion (US$300 million) in damages over an article that allegedly described him as a “conman.”
Through his lawyers, Onyx Advocates, Ssenfuka contends that the publication seriously damaged his reputation, discredited his research into herbal treatments for diabetes and cancer, and drove away potential investors, development partners, and other supporters.

Ssenfuka says his innovation has previously received support from Uganda’s Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation and was presented to President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni and Cabinet. He maintains that the article unfairly portrayed him as a fraud and cast doubt on years of scientific research and innovation.

While announcing the legal action, Ssenfuka addressed journalists and displayed framed photographs, which he said were linked to patients and individuals associated with his work, as part of his effort to defend the credibility of his research.

Andrew Mwenda (Courtesy photo)

The lawsuit stems from an article published in April in The Independent, which Ssenfuka claims contained defamatory statements that caused substantial financial and reputational damage. He argues that the publication discouraged investors and collaborators who had shown interest in supporting his projects.

The case is expected to spark renewed debate over alternative herbal medicine in Uganda, media responsibility when reporting on medical innovations, and the legal standards required to prove reputational and financial harm in defamation cases.

The High Court will determine whether the publication was defamatory and whether Ssenfuka is entitled to the record-breaking compensation he is seeking.

Stay with us for the latest updates as this high-profile case continues to unfold.
Share This Article
Jamal Junior
Editor
Follow:
I am ( KY Jamal) Jamal Junior , a respected digital brand developer, media and PR specialist, news editor, and certified journalist committed to building strong brands and compelling stories that influence audiences.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *