Ad image

“DNA Doesn’t Lie” — Balaam Responds to Tayebwa Over Paul Kafeero Paternity Debate

Balaam emphasized that the DNA process was independently conducted and cross-verified by multiple institutions, reinforcing the reliability of the outcome.

Jamal Junior
By
Jamal Junior - Editor
Balaam Barugahare (Left) - Thomas Tayebwa (Right)
Highlights
  • Balaam maintained that the findings are scientifically sound
  • His remarks quickly triggered renewed debate online
  • Supporters of rejected claimants have continued to question the findings

The controversy surrounding the DNA testing of the late Kadongo Kamu legend Prince Job Paul Kafeero has taken a fresh twist after Local Government Minister Balaam Barugahara publicly defended the forensic findings following comments made by Deputy Speaker Thomas Tayebwa.

Balaam dismissed suggestions that the DNA results could be inaccurate, insisting the findings were scientifically verified by multiple independent laboratories.

Balaam Says Three Laboratories Reached The Same Conclusion

According to Balaam, the paternity tests were conducted and cross-verified by three separate laboratories — MBN, the Uganda Police Forensic Laboratory, and the Directorate of Government Analytical Laboratory.

He maintained that all three institutions independently arrived at the same conclusion, strengthening the credibility of the findings.

The DNA results confirmed that only four of the 25 individuals who claimed to be Kafeero’s biological children were a genetic match to the late music icon.

Balaam also revealed that he personally financed the DNA exercise, a disclosure that has generated further public discussion surrounding the high-profile inheritance dispute.

Meet The Only Four Children DNA Confirmed As Prince Job Paul Kafeero's True Heirs, All We Know
Meet The Only Four Children DNA Confirmed As Prince Job Paul Kafeero’s True Heirs, All We Know

Tayebwa’s Comments Spark Fresh Debate

The latest controversy erupted after Deputy Speaker Thomas Tayebwa shared a photograph of a man who bears a striking resemblance to Paul Kafeero, questioning whether physical appearance alone could contradict the DNA findings.

His remarks quickly reignited debate on social media, with supporters of several rejected claimants demanding further clarification on how the testing process was conducted.

The discussion has once again divided public opinion between those who trust the scientific results and those who believe additional reviews should be carried out.

Balaam Cites Kafeero’s Own Music

Responding to the growing criticism, Balaam referenced one of Kafeero’s songs that reflects on family relationships and paternity, suggesting the legendary singer himself often acknowledged the complexities surrounding identity and parenthood.

He argued that the DNA process remains the most reliable method of establishing biological relationships and should not be overshadowed by speculation or physical resemblance.

Around 21 claimants have effectively been rejected
Around 21 claimants have effectively been rejected

Estate Battle Far From Over

Although the DNA findings have significantly narrowed the list of Kafeero’s legally recognized heirs, supporters of several rejected claimants continue to question the outcome and are calling for greater transparency.

The results are expected to play a major role in determining the future administration of Kafeero’s estate, including music royalties, intellectual property rights, land, and other assets that have remained under dispute for years.

While many believe the findings finally provide clarity to a decades-long family battle, others say the emotional fallout is far from over.

Share This Article
Jamal Junior
Editor
Follow:
I am ( KY Jamal) Jamal Junior , a respected digital brand developer, media and PR specialist, news editor, and certified journalist committed to building strong brands and compelling stories that influence audiences.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *